The Politics of Food
Food and politics are two words that may seem irrelevant. Although most people are not aware that food directly relates to politics. In fact, Food is considered to distinguish between regions, gender and powerful people.
Food can divide general populations of people. Regions of people can cause different people to eat different things. People in the south are more likely to be caught eating fried or barbequed food. Compared to the people in Boston whom enjoy their deep-dish pizza. The again, the people in the northwest love to eat from the dirty food carts. All of these people favor different types of food. Politics, much like food, is related to regions in the same way. People whom live relatively close to each other tend to have similar views on government issues. In addition, people that live close to each other tend to favor the same types of leaders.
Politician have no option on their tour but to eat the food the locals would eat. This may give the politician a literal taste of what the region wants. Whether they like the taste or not the will finish there whole meal. Politicians really want to make impressions on people. They want to leave everyone with a positive attitude. According to cleveland.com while president Obama recently visited Ohio he stopped by Ohio State University. Surprising many students while chatting about the upcoming election. Obama ordered a Reuben sandwich and a slice of Buckeye pie to go. This might be just a coincidence.
Politics allow powerful people to make powerful decisions. Food might not have a say in which bills are passed or vetoed. The food might not be focused upon at all. Although food is more important than the silver ware used to eat it. The type of food served holds great importance. The President of the United States has different meals depending on the occasion. The President might take the Prime Minister of Canada out of a burger at his favorite burger joint. Then again the President would not take the Prime Minister of China to the same place, and maybe instead they would serve a feast for the Prime Minister of China. The difference is not the importance of the person, but instead customs in which leaders are more likely to do business with the United States.
Food can divide general populations of people. Regions of people can cause different people to eat different things. People in the south are more likely to be caught eating fried or barbequed food. Compared to the people in Boston whom enjoy their deep-dish pizza. The again, the people in the northwest love to eat from the dirty food carts. All of these people favor different types of food. Politics, much like food, is related to regions in the same way. People whom live relatively close to each other tend to have similar views on government issues. In addition, people that live close to each other tend to favor the same types of leaders.
Politician have no option on their tour but to eat the food the locals would eat. This may give the politician a literal taste of what the region wants. Whether they like the taste or not the will finish there whole meal. Politicians really want to make impressions on people. They want to leave everyone with a positive attitude. According to cleveland.com while president Obama recently visited Ohio he stopped by Ohio State University. Surprising many students while chatting about the upcoming election. Obama ordered a Reuben sandwich and a slice of Buckeye pie to go. This might be just a coincidence.
Politics allow powerful people to make powerful decisions. Food might not have a say in which bills are passed or vetoed. The food might not be focused upon at all. Although food is more important than the silver ware used to eat it. The type of food served holds great importance. The President of the United States has different meals depending on the occasion. The President might take the Prime Minister of Canada out of a burger at his favorite burger joint. Then again the President would not take the Prime Minister of China to the same place, and maybe instead they would serve a feast for the Prime Minister of China. The difference is not the importance of the person, but instead customs in which leaders are more likely to do business with the United States.